Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Vaccine Immunogenicity among Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy Recipients.

Patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy may have impaired humoral responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccinations owing to their underlying hematologic malignancy, prior lines of therapy, and CAR-T-associated hypogammaglobulinemia. Comprehensive data on vaccine immunogenicity in this patient population are limited. A single-center retrospective study of adults receiving CD19 or BCMA-directed CAR-T therapy for B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma or multiple myeloma was conducted. Patients received at least 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 or 1 dose of Ad26.COV2.S and had SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody (anti-S IgG) levels measured at least 1 month after the last vaccine dose. Patients were excluded if they received SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody therapy or immunoglobulin within 3 months of the index anti-S titer. The seropositivity rate (assessed by an anti-S assay cutoff of ≥.8 U/mL in the Roche assay) and median anti-S IgG titers were analyzed. Fifty patients were included in the study. The median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 58 to 70 years), and the majority were male (68%). Thirty-two participants (64%) had a positive antibody response, with a median titer of 138.5 U/mL (IQR, 11.61 to 2541 U/mL). Receipt of ≥3 vaccines was associated with a significantly higher anti-S IgG level. Our study supports current guidelines for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among recipients of CAR-T therapy and demonstrates that a 3-dose primary series followed by a fourth booster increases antibody levels. However, the relatively low magnitude of titers and low percentage of nonresponders demonstrates that further studies are needed to optimize vaccination timing and determine predictors of vaccine response in this population.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccine immunogenicity among chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy recipients

Introduction Patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy may have impaired humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations due to their underlying hematologic malignancy, prior lines of therapy, and CAR T-cell-associated hypogammaglobulinemia. Comprehensive data on vaccine immunogenicity in this patient population are limited. Methods A single-center retrospective study of adults receiving CD19 or BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma or multiple myeloma was conducted. Patients received at least two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations with BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, or one dose of Ad26.COV2.S and had SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody (anti-S IgG) levels measured at least one month after the last vaccine dose. Patients were excluded if they received SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody therapy or immunoglobulin within three months of the index anti-S titer. The seropositivity rate (assessed by anti-S assay cutoff of ≥0.8 U/mL, Roche assay) and median anti-S IgG titers were analyzed. Results Fifty patients were included in the study. Median age was 65 years (IQR 58–70), and a majority of patients were male (68%). Thirty-two (64%) participants had a positive antibody response, with a median titer of 138.5 U/mL (IQR 11.61–2541). Receiving ≥3 vaccines was associated with a significantly higher anti-S IgG. Conclusion Our study supports current guidelines for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among CAR T-cell recipients and demonstrates that a three-dose primary series followed by a fourth booster increases antibody levels. However, the relatively low magnitude of titers and percent of non-responders demonstrates that further studies are needed to optimize vaccination timing and determine predictors of vaccine response in this population. Graphical Image, graphical

Methods and tools for situational awareness and equitable decision-making during COVID-19

5 Figure 1Screenshot of PCCI community protection dashboard[Figure omitted. See PDF]ConclusionsThere was broad agreement amongst public health leaders and community leaders about the key elements of the data and learning systems required to manage current and future public health responses to COVID-19. These findings may be informative for guiding the use of data and learning in the management of future public health crises (figure 1).

Immunomodulatory fecal metabolites are associated with mortality in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure.

Respiratory failure and mortality from COVID-19 result from virus- and inflammation-induced lung tissue damage. The intestinal microbiome and associated metabolites are implicated in immune responses to respiratory viral infections, however their impact on progression of severe COVID-19 remains unclear. We prospectively enrolled 71 patients with COVID-19 associated critical illness, collected fecal specimens within 3 days of medical intensive care unit admission, defined microbiome compositions by shotgun metagenomic sequencing, and quantified microbiota-derived metabolites (NCT #04552834). Of the 71 patients, 39 survived and 32 died. Mortality was associated with increased representation of Proteobacteria in the fecal microbiota and decreased concentrations of fecal secondary bile acids and desaminotyrosine (DAT). A microbiome metabolic profile (MMP) that accounts for fecal secondary bile acids and desaminotyrosine concentrations was independently associated with progression of respiratory failure leading to mechanical ventilation. Our findings demonstrate that fecal microbiota composition and microbiota-derived metabolite concentrations can predict the trajectory of respiratory function and death in patients with severe SARS-Cov-2 infection and suggest that the gut-lung axis plays an important role in the recovery from COVID-19.

A eulogy for Dr Francisco Miguel Marty Forero.

As some of those who were lucky enough to have been mentored by Dr Francisco Marty in transplant infectious diseases, we stand with the larger medical community in mourning his untimely death and in commemorating him as a uniquely exceptional and talented physician, investigator, teacher, mentor, friend, artist, and human being.

Qualitative review of promising practices for testing vulnerable populations at off-site COVID-19 testing centers.

BACKGROUND: Many off-site COVID-19 testing centers (OSCTCs) are struggling with strategies to serve vulnerable populations who have some of the highest rates of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths. Inter-OSCTC sharing of successful protocols and systems has been hampered by evolving resource constraints, the changing science of testing, and ever increasing COVID-19 case counts. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to identify promising approaches to testing vulnerable populations. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 26 leaders of OSCTCs and public health departments across the United States between June 8th and August 10th, 2020. All interviews were coded utilizing oral coding via rapid identification of themes from audio recordings, and analysis occurred concurrently with data collection to assess when saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Six main themes emerged highlighting approaches to testing within vulnerable populations including: 1. Expanding services to support health and health-related needs beyond COVID-19; 2. Gaining community trust; 3. Developing and leveraging community partnerships; 4. Promoting clear and creative messaging; 5. Prioritizing patient experience; and 6. Managing patient results. CONCLUSIONS: Testing among the vulnerable not only helps those at highest risk of severe disease or death from COVID-19, but also presents a critical opportunity to control viral spread within and from these communities. Reaching vulnerable populations is challenging and requires multi-sector collaboration, additional funding, and high levels of creativity and flexibility.

Qualitative review of early experiences of off-site COVID-19 testing centers and associated considerations.

Given the predicted need for continued SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing, as well as the evolving availability and types of diagnostic tests, off-site COVID-19 testing centers (OSCTC) leaders need timely guidance to ensure they are meeting the needs of their unique populations. This research discusses the challenges and offers considerations for healthcare organizations and others when setting up and running OSCTCs. It also provides a springboard to engage policy makers and leaders in the healthcare community in a discussion about emergency preparedness, and how to better respond to testing needs going forward.